Thundr

Random video chat · review audit

Ome.TV reviews: what 210 public reviews actually say

Before you sign in anywhere, it’s worth knowing what current users say once the novelty wears off. We read through Ome.TV’s public Trustpilot reviews — here’s the pattern that shows up again and again.

2.3/5

Based on 210 public reviews on Trustpilot, read 2026-09-22.

The four complaints that keep coming up

Arbitrary bans~40% of negative reviews

The single most common complaint. Reviewers describe being suspended with no explanation, while accounts that clearly broke the rules stay up.

“Banning people without any reason but you don’t ban the real culprits.”

Paying to get back in~25% of negative reviews

A recurring pattern: once banned, restoring access costs money — or means waiting it out.

“They want you to pay 10 bucks to get back on or wait 700 hours.”

Moderation feels thin~15% of negative reviews

Reports that abusive behaviour from other users doesn’t get addressed quickly.

“Many of the people are vile, and rude... needs better moderation.”

Rules applied unevenly~10% of negative reviews

Some reviewers feel enforcement is inconsistent — one person’s minor slip is another’s free pass.

To be fair to Ome.TV: none of this reads as a platform taking money and vanishing — it’s an active, real product with a real user base. The pattern is narrower than that: when something goes wrong, users feel like the response is a ban with no reason given, and getting back in can mean a fee.

Why Thundr can’t reproduce the pay-to-unban pattern

It’s structural, not a promise: Thundr doesn’t use accounts. There’s no login and no profile tied to your identity, so there’s nothing for a ban to hold hostage and nothing to sell back to you. Moderation is still real — skip and mute are on every screen, and report or block sits on the other person’s profile — it just isn’t enforced through an account you’d have to pay to restore.

FAQ

Ome.TV is a real, active random video chat platform — it’s not a scam in the sense of taking money and disappearing. The recurring complaint in its public reviews isn’t that it’s fake, it’s that bans can feel arbitrary and restoring access can cost money.

Reviewers report bans for unclear reasons, sometimes alongside accounts that clearly broke the rules staying active. Ome.TV hasn’t published a detailed public appeals process, which is why "why was I banned" is a common search around the platform.

Multiple public reviews describe a paid option to restore access sooner, with a long wait time as the free alternative. That’s specific to how Ome.TV’s ban system works — not how every random-chat site handles it.

Yes — Thundr doesn’t use accounts at all. There’s no login, no profile, nothing tied to your identity that a ban could hold hostage. Moderation still applies (skip, mute, report or block are on every screen), it just isn’t enforced through an account you’d have to pay to restore.

Three things reviews across this category keep coming back to: whether moderation actually responds, whether a ban comes with any explanation, and whether getting back in costs money. Read a platform’s recent public reviews for those three before you sign up for anything.

Related reading